A challenge to preconceptions.
First, a photo of the Countess de Castiglione sitting,
presumably posed. The photo is in black
and white, though there are color versions.
She sits facing off the side with one hand on her lap and the other
holding up something to block her face, leaving the audience to see only a bit
of her forehead, her mouth, and her right eye.
Her shoulder hangs out of the dress she wore for the picture, which
epitomized her desire to stand out during her time. This photo is part of a series done by Pierre
Louis Pierson. The series began in 1856
and did not conclude until three decades later, in which Pierson photographed
several hundreds of poses for the Countess.
Many of the photos from the series, like this one, had a seductive aura
about them—something that was not generally acceptable at the time they were
taken. Though risqué, the femininity of
this photo is undeniable.
Next, is a photo of a vandalized Mona Lisa, created and
photographed by Marcel Duchamp in 1919.
The photo is is named L.H.O.O.Q.
The photo was created as a joke, poking fun at the ambiguity of the
gender of the Mona Lisa. With the simple
drawing of a mustache and beard, Duchamp was able to turn around the way people
viewed a very famous painting. Though it
is commonly held that the Mona Lisa portrays a female, it could just as easily
portray a male.
These photos provide evidence of society’s ability to judge
gender based on simple details or features.
Both photos challenged the way people thought about women during their
time. The countess chose to have herself
photographed in promiscuous ways in order to make herself stand out, and go
against the way that women who lived at that time were seen. Duchamp, when he turns the Mona Lisa into a
picture of a man, challenges the reasons that the public categorized the face
in the picture as a woman before. The
notion that the Mona Lisa was a woman, as well as the notion that women were
meant to be covered up all the time, is similar to the way that Judith Butler
describes society perceiving gender today.
For some reason, we shield ourselves from certain possibilities in the
same way we are ignorant of alternative sexualities. In a way, these photos help the alternative
interpretations of the Mona Lisa and femininity “come out”. The concepts that the photos reveal were
always present, but oppressed inside some sort of theoretical closet, the same
way gays and lesbians are. “We are out
of the closet, but into what?” (309). There
still exists resistance once gay people are out. There still exists resistance to women
showing skin. There still exists
resistance to the Mona Lisa being a man.
“For being ‘out’ always depends to some extent on being ‘in’; it gains
its meaning only within that polarity.” (309)
No comments:
Post a Comment